Monday, April 30, 2012

Forward! The Communist slogan now adopted by Obama. (PHOTOS)

Barack Obama's 2012 reelection campaign just released its official slogan for the year. The one iconic leftist propaganda phrase, "Forward".

I suspect this is, and always has been, Barack Obama's personal wet dream, cultivated from a very young age by his radical Marxist mother, self admitted Communist grandfather, and personal childhood mentor, Communist, America hater, and pedophile Frank Marshall Davis.

 The "Forward" slogan isn't anything new to politics. Wikipedia's article on the leftist term Forward states:
The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other leftwing newspapers and publications. For example, Vpered (Russian language for 'Forward') was the name of the publication that Lenin started after having resigned from the Iskra editorial board in 1905 after a clash with Georgi Plekhanov and the Mensheviks.
Just a few examples of the term Forward in Communist/Socialist/Marxist propaganda...

Forward for the Motherland, for our victory!
Under the leadership of the great Stalin - forward to Communism!

Young builders of communism! Forward, to the new successes in work and study!
Under the banner of Lenin and Stalin, forward to victory of communism! 

Go all out and aim high. The east leaps forward, the West is worried
Strike the battle drum of the Great Leap Forward ever louder

Ride the wind and cleave the waves to realise a Leap Forward in all fields

Let's march forward under the banner of Mao Zedong!

Sing revolutionary war songs with fervor, and move forward in victory.
Move fast forward! Construct and protect the Motherland.

The motherland doing a leap forward.

Forward! is also a common phrase within Communist propaganda music. Avante "Forward", Communists, stand up, forward!, Forward to meet the sunrise!, Forward against the Enemy, Forward friends, Forward Red Fleet Czech, Forward Red Marines, Glory to the looking forward, Go Forward Don't Fall, Time Forward...are just a few, as this Communist website will attest.

Democrat Socialist Perspective: Socialism- The Way Forward
Communist China: The Great Leap Forward
UK Socialist Party: The Way Forward for Anti-Capitalism Can We Go Forward If We Fear to Advance Towards Socialism?
South African Communist Party: Forward to Socialism!
India: Forward Communist Party Discussing the way forward for Occupy Forward to Socialist Revolution

All of this should come as no surprise to anyone who actively takes a look at who Barack Obama really is. As I pointed out in an earlier post on Obama's childhood influences, he was born to a radical Communist mother who hated religion, capitalism, and America. It just so happens that her father was also a Communist and also was Obama's legal guardian during his childhood in Hawaii. Also during young Barack Obama's time in Hawaii, said commie Grandpa introduced Obama to one Communist poet, America hater, Christian hater, and blatant pedophile, Frank Marshall Davis, who Obama describes as his "childhood mentor" in his best selling book, Dreams from My Father.

Is it any wonder why Barack Obama has surrounded himself with like minded people who share the same radical leftist ideology? And is it any wonder why some Obama administration officials have been caught and forced to resign for openly Communist views? Anita Dunn and Van Jones come to mind. I only wonder how many more there are. Is it any wonder why an ornament on the Obama Christmas tree at the White House showed the figure of Mao Zedong? Is it any wonder why fellow Marxists who were with Obama during his college years describe him as a "pure Marxist Socialist"? And is it any wonder now why he chooses FORWARD as his slogan? No one should be surprised.


Obama and Communist propaganda tactics
Barack Obama: A History of Communism
Obama's Marxist influences 

Left wing hypocrisy when it comes to life and war.

We all know the drill. When a Republican is president during a war, the anti-war, neo-hippies who value human life protest in droves. When a Democrat is president............... ......... ...... .... ... .. . . .

Ex-CIA Interrogator: Obama's War on Terror Is Less Ethical Than Bush's

It is a hypocrisy that reeks of self righteous indifference. Democrats and liberals make hypocrisy an art. When it comes to the of life and war, the party that touts itself as the one fighting for rights, tolerance, peace, and love falls short.

The Democrats' eerie silence during the Obama years on war is much the same as the Republicans' eerie silence on spending during the Bush years. Liberals love to ask, "Where was the tea party during the Bush years?" They have a valid point. But now I ask, "Where in the hell is the anti-war movement during the Obama years?" Gone without a trace. As Warden Norton put it in the Shawshank Redemption..."...up and vanished like a fart in the wind!"

Obama continued military operations both in Iraq and Afghanistan. But let's not stop there. Obama decided to go beyond what Bush could ever dream of, launching military operations in Yemen, Libya, and now has US special forces on the ground in Africa. Drone attacks in Pakistan have jumped from 8 strikes per year under Bush, to a staggering 63 strikes per year under Obama, and that isn't even counting the 8 months remaining in 2012. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports 52 total strikes under Bush and 267 under Obama. Still "air raiding villages and killing civilians it seems..."

Oh but wait!

Obama ended the War in Iraq, remember? He put an end to Bush's stupid war. He brought the troops home!  The nonsense is laughable. If you'll recall, anti-war presidential candidate Obama promised throngs of salivating, fainting voters that bringing troops home from Iraq and ending the war would be the very first thing he would do as president. Instead, he stuck to the Bush timetable of 12/31/11 and put Iraq on the backburner while fighting for more important things.

"Obama got Osama!" Now this one really makes me want to vomit. The left actually pretending to care about the war on terrorism or capturing/killing Osama bin Laden. Because this happened under Obama's watch, the anti-war, hippie left is now ecstatic. Not because we killed Osama, but because Obama can take credit for something...anything. Nevermind the fact that the left adamantly opposed all operations in Afghanistan to fight the Taliban or kill Osama, as early as, well, before the invasion even took place in 2001! It's ok though, because Barack Obama is president.

American casualties during the Obama war years have skyrocketed. But the media won't report on that. During Bush's rule, from 2001-2008, 564 US troops died in Afghanistan, an average of 70 a year. During Obama's rule, from 2009-2012, 1314 US troops have died in Afghanistan, an average of 328 a year...and that isn't even counting the remaining 8 months of 2012! Where oh where is peace loving liberal media? Where oh where is the anti-war left?

They are liars and hypocrites.

On the issue of war they have no credibility. Expect the anti-war protests to magically spring to life once again if Mitt Romney wins the election. And if their disgusting, vile indifference towards war isn't bad enough, their hypocrisy on the value of life is even worse.

The party of rights and love and peace and tolerance somehow also seems to be the party that supports extinguishing human life in its most precious, delicate, and early stages...on a mass scale. Life is sacred and the most fundamental human right is life, yet those that tout themselves as the champions of human rights fail to acknowledge this most basic human right.

Yet somehow, these people that claim to love life, who love to protest war and the killing of innocent civilians (when a Republican is in power) and support the aborting of innocent human life strangely DO support the human life of those who have taken innocent human life, in the most diabolic of ways. It couldn't get any more backwards.

Liberals: Fighting for the right to life for Charles Manson, fighting against the right to life for an unborn child, and supporting war, if a Democrat is in charge.

"Our Hero" Ron Paul

Cross posted at RRR

Notice the capital "H". This was the latest headline over at The Daily Paul. I am actually taking a course called Cult Behavior 101. My textbook is The Daily Paul.

"Ron in past speeches has referenced the Lord of the Rings. For those of you that are familiar with the story, after hearing what my friend said, it made me think of Ron being Frodo and having to carry such a heavy burden in his quest to destroy the great evil that is close to destroying everything that We, the free peoples of this World hold dear. He carries all of our hopes and dreams. So my friends, My fellow Patriots, I ask you with great humbleness and sincerity, To remember, that we all need to be lifting Ron up and filling him with positive energy and Peace. We all need to be careful, To not drain our Hero in our quest to gain his energy and wisdom. To be mindful, To not increase his burden by placing our expectations on him. He has to be exhausted and overwhelmed. Let us all focus as much consciousness and energy as we can towards Ron, So he can find his balance and some Inner Peace."

Like I have said before, these types don't really fight for freedom. They fight for a figure they want to rely on, a cult of personality, and a Savior.

I wish the 10% of Ron Paul supporters who actually support the message more than the man would openly denounce the cult behavior spewed daily within the Paul ranks.

It is really a shame. Ron Paul had a good message but his candidacy was marred by lunatics and closet liberals within his base. The same happened in 2008 with Truthers, though that has died down a bit in 2012.

Maybe sometime within the next 10 years some of them will admit Ron Paul didn't get the nomination in 2012.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Dan Savage: Obama's favorite homosexual who hates Christians (Video)

Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses Christian Teens

It was supposed to be an anti-bullying conference. Instead, it was a blatant attack on Christianity.
Savage was supposed to be delivering a speech about anti-bullying at the National High School Journalism Conference sponsored by the Journalism Education Association and the National Scholastic Press Association. But it turned into an episode of Christian-bashing. Tuttle said a number of his students were offended by Savage’s remarks – and some decided to leave the auditorium. “It became hostile,” he said. “It felt hostile as we were sitting in the audience – especially towards Christians who espouse beliefs that he was literally taking on.” Tuttle said the speech was laced with vulgarities and “sexual innuendo not appropriate for this age group.” At one point, he said Savage told the teenagers about how good his partner looked in a speedo. The conservative website CitizenLink was the first to report about the controversy. They interviewed a 17-year-old girl who was one of students who walked out of the auditorium. “The first thing he told the audience was, ‘I hope you’re all using birth control,’” she told CitizenLink. “he said there are people using the Bible as an excuse for gay bullying, because it says in Leviticus and Romans that being gay is wrong. Right after that, he said we can ignore all the (expletive deleted) in the Bible.” As the teenagers were walking out, Tuttle said that Savage heckled them and called them pansy-assed. “You can tell the Bible guys in the hall they can come back now because I’m done beating up the Bible,” Savage said as other students hollered and cheered. “It’s funny as someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back.”

 The speech was delivered by militant man lover Dan Savage. His pointed attack on Christians under the guise of tolerance is typical of the left wing.

Dan Savage is your typical liberal. He preaches tolerance, peace, and love for everyone. Unless you are a Christian. Ironically, Muslims are exempt.

Bottom line: Dan Savage engages in disgusting, backwards, unnatural acts that are counter to human anatomy and the natural world.

No amount of Bible bashing can change these facts.

Note: The Obama administration is completely behind Dan Savage. (pun intended) The same Dan Savage that said he wished "All Republicans were f*****g dead." and that he wanted to "F*** the S*** out of Rick Santorum."

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Immigration no longer requires assimilation.

Some time ago I wrote a post, more of a rant than anything, on extreme multiculturalism. I included President Teddy Roosevelt's wise words of wisdom on the topic.

"The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities."
 ---Theodore Roosevelt, 1915

 "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn't doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people." 
---Theodore Roosevelt, 1919

Roosevelt saw the dangers of extreme multiculturalism undermining the American identity, even back then. Could you imagine what he would think today?

Could our nation be characterized as "dwellers in a polygot boarding house?" Unquestionably so.

Since when did immigration, legal or illegal, not include assimilation? The older I get and the more I actually observe the immigrant class, the more I realize that the immigrants we have coming to this country today in the 21st century are not the immigrants that came to America in droves in the early 20th century. There is a complete difference in ideology and philosophy between the two.

It is increasingly rare to find an immigrant who genuinely loves this country and wants to be an American first and foremost. Instead, the majority of immigrants choose to hold their allegiance to their native land, making no effort whatsoever to assimilate into the American culture.

Learn to bake apple pie. Try to watch baseball o fĂștbol Americano. Drive a Chevy. Learn about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Be proud to call yourself an American and honored to live in the greatest country on earth!

Instead, there are many who immigrate here with no intention of assimilating into the culture. America is simply a landmass, nothing more.

Perhaps I am a different breed. I can tell you, if I immigrated to any other country I would make a conscious effort to actively assimilate into that culture by learning the native language, adopting the customs, learning to appreciate that country's art and being happy and grateful to be a citizen of that nation. I can't imagine moving to Russia and refusing to learn Russian or flying a big fat patriotic American flag over my residence in Moscow. If I moved to another country and started a life there, I would proudly fly that nation's flag and be proud to call myself a citizen of that country, whether it is Canada, Spain, Argentina, or Sweden.

There are plenty of patriotic immigrants out there. From all nations. My time in the Army has allowed me to meet proud Americans of countless backgrounds: Korean, Indian, Mexican, and Iranian to name a few. They love America, which is why they chose to serve. Unfortunately these patriots are a dying breed.

The United States and the West are too tolerant. And immigrants know this. They know they can get away with it. Muslims are who I am referring to here and the European nations, primarily Britain, France, and Belgium are just now beginning to realize the destructive path they have started down. In Brussels, Muslims make up 25% of the total population, and segregate themselves into strict Islamic communities, such as "Little Morocco", which are governed by Shariah law and have no regard for the nation's rule of law. The same can be observed here in the United States, in places such as Dearborn, Michigan, which some have nicknamed "Dearbornistan".

It isn't just Muslims or those of Arab descent. There is an increasing number of immigrants of Hispanic origin who are beginning to identify with La Raza and the Mexica Movement in the American southwest. If you haven't heard of the Mexica Movement their mission statement goes something like this: "The United States stole land from Mexico and all European Americans should be deported to Europe and the American southwest given back to Mexico." This video pretty much sums it up...

These are extremists. But the basic ideology is widespread. No need to assimilate or better yet..."I am not an American." This is a problem and should be addressed. 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Primary mission: Beating Barack Obama

That should be first and foremost in every single American's mind. On the heels of Mitt Romney's 5 state sweep last night, moving him closer to the official nomination, it is evident there is a stark contrast in ideology among conservatives.

There are those who firmly believe a Mitt Romney presidency would be just as damaging, both short term and long term, as a second Obama term. I find this viewpoint utterly idiotic to be honest.

And there are those, like myself, who believe anything and everything should be done to help Mitt Romney challenge Obama. We acknowledge he isn't the perfect candidate, nor the perfect conservative. We live in an imperfect world and you have to work with what you have.

Liberty At Stake puts it perfectly in "We're All Mitten's Men Now".

"The point is, those of us in the conservative coalition need to get completely behind Romney, now that he is the sure GOP nominee, and do everything possible to help him defeat the Saul Alinsky radical in the White House. Any other position is fundamentally un-conservative. To be conservative is first and foremost to see the world as it is. Four more years of this inept and radical left wing governance from BHO and His Corrupt Gang of Progressiveswould be a complete disaster for the republic. Not casting a vote , or throwing away your vote on a quixotic 3rd party candidate, because Mittens isn’t the perfect conservative, is as good as voting for the Saul Alinsky radical. That’s how the system works. To be conservative is to understand when it is time to suck it up, hitch up the big boy pants, and cooperate to graduate. (Flag thrown for clichĂ© abuse) This is such a time. "

However, there are still those on the right who simply won't support Romney. Even if it means giving Obama another term.

Every day, I take a stroll over to Ron Paul Cult Central, AKA The Daily Paul, partly because half of me still likes Ron Paul and partly because I find the comments and articles from Ron Paul supporters wildly and childishly entertaining. These people take pride in attacking Mitt Romney more than Barack Obama. And they firmly believe Ron Paul still will win. Despite the fact Ron Paul has received the least amount of votes and the least amount of delegates out of the remaining 4 GOP candidates, somehow he still has the best chance of winning the nomination and the general election. The millions of people who voted for Mitt Romney over the course of the primary season just dropped from the sky apparently. Take this for example:

"Let's keep the eye on the prize. We were not expected to do well in Romney territory. But, look at the numbers. We are only growing. The media is starting to recognize our movement. We are about Dr. Paul and we are about a movement. We are not giving up on Dr. Paul and we are not giving up on the movement. The convention in Tampa is one goal but not the only goal. We can still get Dr. Paul the nomination. Don't be fooled by the media. But, keep in mind this is a long "slog" and we are laying the foundation for the future are well. Keep it up everyone. Lick your wounds from yesterday but keep it up and take pride in the work we are doing. Now, stop the chatter, get phone banking, get canvassing, get donating, get going. Go Ron Paul."

The denial and fantasy world they live in over there borders on 2008 Obamabot "free gas/mortgage" insanity. Just remember, there is a conspiracy to silence Ron Paul and he has actually won each state. In Tampa everyone will catch Paulbot Jew-hate hippie fever and be instantly overcome with Ron Paul rainbow flowerpower as he rides a powerful wave of momentum all the way to the White House....

Meanwhile, myself and the rest of those grounded in reality will get behind Romney. Why? Not because we like Romney. Not because we desire a Romney presidency. And not because it is what "The Republicans have told us to do." We will be voting with our conscience too. Our consciences tell us that Obama must be defeated.

Personally, I would prefer that the Judicial Branch not be overrun by radical left Obama appointees for the next 20-30 years. Would you prefer an ultra left supermajority on the Supreme Court?

Barack Obama is no ordinary Democrat. Barack Obama is a radical quasi-Marxist who has been bred from early childhood to hate the colonialism of the United States and the Western nations, the unfairness of capitalism and the free market system, and the "prejudice" of an American society run by white men. This is who Obama is. His arrogance and disdain for America far exceeds that of traditional Democrats like John Kerry or the late Ted Kennedy.

I am a conservative who is in tune with reality. Mitt Romney is our best chance to dethrone Barack Obama and I will fight for him to win with every last breath I have up until election day.

Now that's justice for Trayvon! Black mob beats white man nearly to death.

Man Beaten By Mob, In Critical Condition
According to police, Owens fussed at some kids playing basketball in the middle of Delmar Drive about 8:30 Saturday night. They say the kids left and a group of adults returned, armed with everything but the kitchen sink. Police tell News 5 the suspects used chairs, pipes and paint cans to beat Owens. Owens' sister, Ashley Parker, saw the attack. "It was the scariest thing I have ever witnessed." Parker says 20 people, all African American, attacked her brother on the front porch of his home, using "brass buckles, paint cans and anything they could get their hands on." Police will only say "multiple people" are involved. What Parker says happened next could make the fallout from the brutal beating even worse. As the attackers walked away, leaving Owen bleeding on the ground, Parker says one of them said "Now thats justice for Trayvon."

I hope Trayvon Martin's family, including his money grubbing mother who wants to make money off her dead son, race baiters Al Sharpton, Jesse Hijackson, Eric Holder, The Black Panthers, Barack Obama and every other black supremacist in this country is happy. Instead of urban blacks killing themselves, now they are targeting white people. Bravo to all those mentioned above. They called for more blood and they got it.

To those in the inner cities of all colors, black, white, tan, red, purple....I urge you to either A) move to an area where packs of wild savages like the people who attacked this man don't live or B) purchase a firearm and be ready to defend yourself.

The race riots will come and it will only get worse.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Cult behavior intermingles with politics.

Characteristics associated with cultic groups

Before reading these characteristics, I'd like you to think of what current political leaders and followers, in either party, qualify.

The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law. ‪

Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished. ‪ Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s). ‪

The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth). ‪

The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity). ‪

The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society. ‪ The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations). ‪

The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members' participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities). ‪

The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt in order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion. ‪

Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group. ‪

The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members. ‪

The group is preoccupied with making money. ‪ Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities. ‪

Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members. ‪ The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group.

They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.

Well, who did you come up with? 

Monday, April 23, 2012

How Mia Love dismantles the liberals' racism/sexism argument.

Recently we have learned that conservative Republican Mia Love has won the nomination for Utah's newly created 4th Congressional District. The heads of liberals from coast to coast have exploded in sheer amazement. How could racist, women hating Republicans vote for a black woman? (I guess for the same reasons they voted for Herman Cain, Tim Scott, Charles Lollar, and Allen West...)

If this nomination of Mia Love in Utah isn't enough to dash the ill conceived notions of liberals and Obama supporters I don't know what is.

Some things to consider:

Utah is widely regarded as one of the most red states in the nation. Last year, Business Insider listed Utah as the 5th most conservative state in the nation, with Gallup polling data to back it up. Provo, Utah is consistently ranked as the most conservative city in the nation.

Utah has the 7th lowest population of African Americans per 100 citizens at 0.77. Over 80% of the population is white and less than 1% black.

The newly mapped 4th district Mia Love is running in contains the cities of Nephi, Payson, West Valley City, West Jordan, and Sandy.

Nephi: 5389 residents. 97% white.
Payson: 18294 residents. 94% white.
West Valley City: 129480 residents. 65% white. 33% hispanic.
West Jordan: 103712 residents. 89% white. 10% hispanic.
Sandy: 87461 residents. 93% white. 4% hispanic.

The highest percentage of African Americans is 1.96%, in West Valley City.

The two counties in Utah that the 4th district covers are Salt Lake and Utah counties with McCain getting 48% and 78% of the vote respectively in 2008. However, Salt Lake county includes Salt Lake City, which isn't within the 4th district. Even then, Obama won the county in 2008 by just 296 votes, out of 353680 total votes. Extremely conservative for a major city. In 2004, Salt Lake county voted for Bush by 60% and Utah county by 86%.

What can we learn from all this? That Utah's 4th district is extremely conservative and extremely white.

Yet they nominate a black woman to represent them. Mia Love and the intentions of voters in Utah's 4th Congressional District prove that the wild accusations of racism and sexism by those on the left towards the right are completely baseless.

Nice try libs. 

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Feminists attack LEGO for marketing toys for girls.

It's always a lose lose with feminazis. Exclude them and they'll scream "oppression". Include them and they'll fabricate a bogus claim that girls are being prodded by society from an early age to be.........GIRLS! The horror!
"They have little breasts and they have fancy hair," the organization's executive director, Dana Edell, told "And it just disturbs us that this is the image that they want girls to see." Edell also objects to what she calls stereotyping of preferred pastimes for girls. "What it's doing is telling girls that this is what's important to you," Edell said of the beauty parlor and hot tub sets. "Girls aren't building space shuttles, they're getting their nails done."

Would you rather they have huge arms, beards, and working construction?

This is the same psychopathic phobia that causes ultra relativist liberals in Sweden to test their idiot social experiments on pre-schoolers in a special "gender neutral school".  It is also the same disorder (and I'm putting that lightly) that drives a Canadian couple to raise their child in a "gender neutral" environment, free from "social constraints". A couple in Sweden also did this, and I'm sure there are many more around the world in enlightened hotspots of liberal enlightenment where up = down, right = wrong, and there is really no definition to anything at all, except what you make of it.

Boys and girls are genetically wired to be drawn to different things. It is how we grow up to be men and women, with unique characteristics, desires, and views of life. There are many liberals, and extreme feminists particularly, who simply do not understand the ways of the world and what is normal and what is not normal. They want men and women to be equal, not only in sensible matters such as suffrage and work pay, but also physically, mentally, and spiritually to a degree so extreme, that there no longer are any definitive characteristics of male and female and the concepts of femininity and masculinity are things of the past. 

This relativist ideology dominates thinking on the left, in every nation. 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Ron Paul Supporter Quote of the Day: "I also will vote for Obama."

More insanity from the Ron Paul cult. I now wonder if the percentage of true conservative Ron Paul supporters who care about this country is 2% or 1%. Maybe even less.

"Yes, I will also vote for Obama. It's to show the GOP the same respect they've given Ron Paul in this election. I'm not the only one. I used to believe in voting with my conscience, but, the system is a joke, so might as well treat it as such."

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

America's poor: Not so poor.

Is our country really that poor? I don't think so.

The moment those in poverty sell their television, their personal computer, their cell phone, their Air Jordans, their silver watches, gold chains, and 22s then I might consider that person to be in a state of relative poverty.

The United States is the only nation on earth where "poor" people can still afford a decent sized house/apartment, a computer and monthly internet service, a TV, a cell phone, expensive shoes, a car, lottery tickets, cigarettes, and routine weekend escapades to the clubs and bars downtown.

These are the same people who are "struggling to put food on the table" and desperately in need of government assistance.

Don't tell me you're poor because you can't afford to go to the club this weekend. And don't tell me our government needs to "tax the rich" so you can indulge yourself some more on the taxpayer dime.

The moment I see a homeless person with basketball shoes or a basketball jersey, a watch, nice jeans, and a cell phone, I lose any and all sympathy I might have had for them. Likewise, I have no sympathy for the "struggling" lower class in America who somehow doesn't have enough money to put food on the table but has plenty of money for non-necessities.

The American standard of living far exceeds that of the rest of the world, and our warped perception of "poverty" is a testament to this. Anyone who has traveled to a 3rd world country can attest.

Along similar lines,  the poverty stricken "victims" of this unfair, cruel, and inherently racist society also seem to be able to afford Obama 2012 bumper stickers in droves for their low riding Cadillacs and Lincolns.

Give me a break. 

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Anti Obama Ammunition for 2012.

Americans for Prosperity makes great videos. Here are a few of their best on Solyndra...

ShePac's effective "Million Dollar Man" video...

Here is the RNC's most popular video and probably the most effective.

And another from the RNC...

American Crossroads is also a good source of anti-Obama videos. Their best in my opinion...

On Operation Fast and Furious, the NRA has provided us this comprehensive video...

IlluminatiTV did a video on Barack Obama's support of partial birth abortion back in 2008. I think the video is still relevant in 2012...

10000Pennies has put out some of the very best easy to understand videos for those who might not follow politics as much...

(I highly recommend 10000Pennies videos. They are entertaining and easy to understand. These are definitely the videos you want to share on Facebook or other social media.)

Glenn Beck put out this video in response to Obama's Tom Hanks propaganda piece, The Road We've Traveled...

On a humorous note, here's this one from the NRSC...

A lot of propaganda, but propaganda we need, because the other side will be churning out Soros funded propaganda videos left and right this year.

Have any other favorite videos to share with friends who might not be as politically active? Feel free to share and I'll add them to the list.

The best rant against Occupy Wall Street you'll ever hear.

I will warn all of you, these following videos include extremely heavy profanity. If you are offended by profanity in any way, you might not like these exchanges.

To anyone who hates Occupy, class warfare, and the divide and conquer tactics of the left, you will find these rants completely therapeutic. If you would enjoy listening to someone thrash the liberal agenda in a way that makes Micheal Savage appear nice, then I highly encourage you to listen.

Opie and Anthony rail against pampered, suburban baby Occupy protesters and how they differ from Middle East protesters. 

Opie and Anthony take callers from Occupy supporters in this video. Wait for the complete ERUPTION of rage from Anthony at 4:50 in response to a caller talking about economic unfairness. 

In related news, 5 more Occupy protesters were arrested yesterday for blocking the entrance to the New York Stock Exchange. 

Monday, April 16, 2012

VIDEO: Bob Beckel's Hilarious F Bomb on Hannity!

I really found this exchange quite funny for a number of reasons.

1) His passion and forcefulness when actually saying the word as well as his ignorance in not knowing they were on the air well into the clip.
2) Neal Boortz trying to spin the toy football 15 seconds in.
3) The perfect illustration of the quintessential liberal. No sense of civil discourse and blaming another for your F**k up. Yes, pun intended!

Just an all around hilarious video no matter what political side you are on!

H/T The Last Tradition

Infowars and followers of the Alex Jones cult.

Usually, if I ever get into any sort of political discussion with anyone, the moment they use as a source, I know any sort of rational debate or discourse is over and promptly end the conversation. The followers of the Alex Jones cult and his premier propaganda outlet, Infowars, are some of the most despicable people that can be found across the entire political spectrum.

Take this article for example.

Man Locked in House Burned to Death in Foreclosure Eviction Shoot-out with Cops

Police say a man shot a sheriff’s deputy and a locksmith when they tried to evict him from the his apartment which was being foreclosed on.

Police say the man then locked himself inside the house resulting in a standoff with police during which police flew flash grenades, tear gas and other concussive explosive devices into the apartment for over an hour in an attempt to force the man out.

The result of the chaos was a fire during the which the man was burned to death.

Seemingly a non story. But if you'll look at the comments from the Infowars community, you will see that the entire purpose of this story was to blame the police for "murdering" an innocent citizen; and further proof of the "fascist police state".

Some words of wisdom from the Alex Jones crowd:

"Were the cops wearing their black executioner hoods when they killed the guy? They at least owed him that… to know the faces of his killers."

"Maybe this type of resistance is just what the doctor ordered (and I don’t mean Ron Paul). A rapid response team of well disciplined patriots could have swept in and cleaned out that SWAT team in 30 seconds flat. Hell, they only had 10 hours to prepare for it! I envision about 15 men on fast motorcycles armed with well sighted semi automatic rifles coming in from behind with a surprise attack inflicting enormous, demoralizing damage to the NWO minions. They could vanish in all directions as quickly as they came in. And when the cops parade their falled “heros” through the streets of Modesto for the fools to worship, they could attack them again! This is where it is all headed so why waste time. They will get the hint real quick that there is no percentage in doing the banker’s bidding. Organize!!!"

"Suicide by cop. There are some things that are worse than death itself, like living on the streets, enslavement or Fascism, of course there are those who actually think otherwise, like homeless people, slaves and Fascists."

"I keep telling everyone Cops are not our friends..When my States says its illegal to carry nun-Chucks or a metal baton ..I say come and get them..We have the right to bear arms any arms!!!
This Country is going to be at war soon!!!"

Notice not a single word of condemnation for the criminal who shot and killed the locksmith and deputy. So is the nature of Alex Jones anarchists.

I almost got sucked in to the anarchist, anti-authority, 9/11 truther, Alex Jones crowd. Until I realized they were just that. A fringe group of extreme anarchist libertarians who hate America and believe a government conspiracy is the cause every time their internet connection goes out. These people represent a small cross section of the Ron Paul base. Speaking from personal experience, the time I began taking everything that Alex Jones and Infowars said as gospel was also the time when I began to follow Ron Paul (roughly 2007-2008). Many of their views are in bed with each other and, if you'll look very closely, aligned with the Occupy Wall Street movement as well.

Alex Jones types within the Ron Paul movement do not in any way help his credibility, or the credibility of Ron Paul followers. I've written many times about "The Ron Paul Cult" and I've also stressed that these nutjobs are not representative of the entire Paul base. Regardless, they should be addressed by someone. The Ron Paul following has been hijacked from sensible limited government libertarians (Tim Daniel of Left Coast Rebel comes to mind) by extreme anarchist lunatics who share a variety of characteristics including: blatant and vicious Antisemitism, complete disregard for any and all authority, equal hatred for conservatives and liberals, 9/11 conspiracy theories, hatred towards the military and police, and rabid support for legalizing drugs. These views are exactly in lock step with the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Alex Jones and his following of cowardly, Guy Fawkes mask wearing, anarchist children and revolutionary wannabes should be rounded up and put in the fictional Fema "concentration camps" they so love to scream about. Hopefully, under the watchful and abusive guard of the police officers and SWAT teams they so badly want to kill.

Mitt Romney vs. Barack Obama. Who is really out of touch?

This is something I have wanted to address for some time now.

A common talking point within political discussion these days is that mean, white, rich Republican Mitt Romney is out of touch with the blue collar American and Barack Obama somehow is.

These ignorant ramblings will be emanating from the left wing Democratic Party corpse from now until election day.

A few examples from Occupy Democrats for Obama:

"Obama has this in the bag. Romney is the epitome of 1% and he does not give a rat’s ass about the middle and lower class. The only bags that are being packed are the ones Romney will have to pack going back to Massachusetts.. OBAMA 2012"

"Romney, A greedy tax cheat who stashes his ill-gotten money in Swiss banks like the Mafia, I believe that there is something more than just the typical money laundering charge with people who hide their money in foreign accounts. by refusing to divulge it, Romney may be hiding something even bigger than just not paying taxes or the methods in which he obtained his wealth by stealing money from regular Americans, I think that there is something even shadier going on with the Mormon guy. I just can’t believe that Republicans would support this very very shady man."

"LMAO …… Mitt … you and your non working wifey poo are just a couple of blow hards. I’ve got news for both of you …… the Whitehouse is no longer for sale to you rich pieces of ****."

Of course, I wouldn't expect any less from the ignorant, cult members of the left who, ironically, take their marching orders from the corrupt Chicago on the Potomac leviathan who spoon feeds them every manner of divisive talking points. Women are "under attack". Republicans hate minorities. Rich people need to be taxed higher to pay for poor people's cigarettes, booze, and lottery tickets, etc.

Speaking of rich, out of touch people...let's take a look at our "down to earth" President the rich people-haters so love to worship as "one of them".

In 2007, Barack Obama made 4.2 million. In 2008, 2.6 million. In 2009, 5.5 million. In 2010, 1.7 million. In 2011, only $789,674. Wow, it really took a dip!

Bear in mind, this is the guy whose income is from writing a book and being in government. Never has be worked a real job. Never has be filled a payroll. Never has he hired a worker. Never has he struggled to pay for anything. The guy was pampered from day one, through college, all the way to the White House and it shows in his and his family's behavior, as if Emperor and Empress.

The Dear Leader who is so in touch with the every day American is the guy who has continues to take extravagant, lavish vacations on the taxpayer dime. 1.4 million family vaca to Hawaii. A 10 day private excursion at Martha's Vineyard. 92+ rounds of golf. Secret "Alice in Wonderland" parties at the White House with Johnny Depp.

At least when Bush vacationed, he went to his own place and spent his off time clearing brush.

Michelle? The "down to earth" First Lady spent 10 million effing dollars in vacations in ONE year. Michelle, the "down to earth" First Lady flies to her exotic vacation spots separately. Michelle, the--you get the picture...enjoying the fruits of her labor with 60 of her friends on vacation in Spain. Michelle Obama, who carries around a $6000 purse. And wears $635 shoes. And 40K diamonds. And 2K dresses.

Barack and Michelle Obama are perhaps the most out of touch political family in America. They are fraud lawyers who have never worked a real job in their lives. Never created any wealth. Never struggled paycheck to paycheck. Never contributed a single, damn thing to the American economy.

As of just a few days ago, Barack is now "scouting out" Colombia as another possible vacation spot for Empress Michelle.

It is such a sick irony.

You all better get used to it. This will be a liberal attack you are going to hear the entire year. 

Sunday, April 15, 2012

The Obama Secret Service: Fun with pictures

And below is a blank template. Have fun and be creative!

Obama: "Scouting out" vacation spots for Michelle.

It seems they aren't even discreet about it anymore.

Obama in Colombia: ‘Part of My Job Is to Scout Out Where I May Want to Bring Michelle Back Later for Vacation’

Just two days after President Barack Obama gave a sharply edged response to news anchor Larry Conners of KMOV in St. Louis after Conners had asked the president about Americans who “get frustrated and even angered when they see the first family jetting around [to] different vacations and so forth,” Obama told a panel at the Summit of the Americas in Cartagena, Colombia that part of his job there was to scout out locations for a future vacation with First Lady Michelle Obama.

Obama was speaking on a panel with Colombian President Juan Mauel Santos and Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff when he made the remarks. The panel was moderated by Chris Matthews of MSNBC.

“I want to thank President Santos and the people of Colombia for the extraordinary hospitality in the beautiful city of Cartagena,” said Obama. “We're having a wonderful time. And usually when I take these summit trips, part of my job is to scout out where I may want to bring Michelle back later for vacation. So we'll make sure to come back sometime in the near future.

Just remember everyone, it's Bush's fault.

Friday, April 13, 2012

The typical Obama supporter.

Based upon countless hours of debating and discussing issues with Obama supporters, both online and in person, I can effectively summarize by placing them in one of three groups.

A) They hate whitey.
B) They believe women are under attack.
C) They hate rich people.

In each of these subgroups, rational thought process is thrown out the window and facts ignored, while extreme emotion governs all. In most cases, the rabid Obama supporter (more a card carrying cultist than anything) is angry or feels genuinely threatened.

Subgroup A is predominately African-American, with a small percentage of guilty east and west coast liberals making up the rest. They march in step with the doctrines of Jeremiah Wright, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, Derrick Bell, Eric Holder, and ultimately, race baiting extraordinaire Barack Obama.  They believe the white man has kept them down and will always keep them down. They want Obama to give them money. They believe in reparations for slavery. They believe whitey is evil. They are angry, emotional, unstable people who get preyed on by the likes of the above mentioned race baiting All Star team. This can be found in the political reactions to the seemingly apolitical Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case. Of course, to those in subgroup A, facts are funny things not to be believed. Black people are under attack, literally and metaphorically, by white people and Barack Obama will save them by paying for their gasoline and mortgage and sticking it to the white man.

Subgroup B represents a new brand of vicious feminism, crafted and nurtured by the Obama campaign for the very purpose of the 2012 election. Naturally, those in this category are mostly women. And, naturally, emotions run high. This is makes them vulnerable and Democrats have wasted no time in taking advantage of it. The Obama warriors is subgroup B legitimately believe that Republicans hate women. That Republicans want to ban any and all forms of women's birth control. Women's health is under attack! (*only limited to reproductive organs.) That Republicans want women out of all leadership roles. That Republicans, if elected, will take women back to the pre-suffrage era. They view pursuit of happiness as "like, you know, like, free birth control." No facts or basis for these arguments is ever provided, simply emotionally charged Democratic talking points that are parroted over and over again like a broken record. Strangely, those in subgroup B are also allies with subgroup A, in that they both share a distinct common enemy: Caucasian males. Only Caucasian males share the brunt of the emotion and anger emanating from subgroup B.

Subgroup C encompasses most of the Democratic party and the Obama base. The stance of this camp can best be understood by visiting any Occupy Wall Street event. Unlike subgroups A and B, subgroup C is not limited to any one race or gender. Those here are ticked they don't make as much money as others in America and they want more without having to earn it. They dislike Capitalism. They don't like to work. They look down on business and most believe in any one of the leftist "isms". Marxism. Socialism. Communism. Whatever works to take money from the rich and give it to them. Like A and B, the Bolsheviks in C are angry and feel threatened. They hate the rich man and they believe more money should be confiscated by government from them so the poor can buy more alcohol, cigarettes, and lottery tickets from the gas station every Friday.

This is the Obama base. Angry people who hate the white man, hate the rich man, and believe in the Obama fabricated "war on women". All 3 feel they are victims of an unjust society and they need the helping hand of government. Just like a cultist would, they parrot everything they are spoon fed by their leaders. Their emotions take over and rational thought is thrown aside.

The Kool Aid is a'flowin! 

Rick Santelli dismantles Obama economic philosophy in 3 minutes.

Someone please make this guy the Republicans' campaign ad manager.

H/T Left Coast Rebel

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Colorblind: 2012 Race Relations in America

2012 is the Republicans' election to lose.

It has been proven 3 years running now, that conservatism is the dominant ideology in the United States, far outpacing liberalism by a two to one ratio.

On virtually every major issue important to potential voters, conservatives hold an advantage. But I am going to highlight three major issues that, if handled properly, could give the GOP a serious advantage in the general election.


If there is one single issue Republicans hold a major advantage in, it is domestic oil production. On drilling for oil, 2 out of every 3 Americans favor offshore drilling. Support for drilling in Alaska has reached an all time high. Gas prices directly affect Americans at the pump. The Barack Obama energy plan is a failure and negatively affects the people. Mitt Romney's campaign needs to hammer Obama and Democrats on this issue. Replay the words of Barack Obama and Energy Secretary Steven Chu until every American can recite them by heart.


Beat Obama to the punch. Vow to withdraw all ground troops from Afghanistan and make it a central issue in the campaign. This promise would be embraced by a war weary nation where 7 out of every 10 Americans now believes we should not be there. This could bring a much needed boost to the Republican ticket.


Barack Obama is proven to be one of the absolute worst jobs creation presidents in history. As unemployment still hovers above 8%, and more realistically 11% if you really do the math, the nation yearns for positive job creation. Again Barack Obama is on the wrong side of the most important issue in the election according to most Americans. Bombard Americans with proven statistics on Obama's economic failures. At the same time, the Romney camp should relentlessly contrast Romney's economic experience to Obama's in ways that the average American will understand and welcome. Run this issue to death, until the American people instantly think "Obama" the moment they hear the word "unemployment". And no amount of political spin can do away with the national misery index being the highest in 28 years.

*Other things the GOP should beat to the bloody pulp: Fast and Furious, Solyndra

It is really quite a phenomenon. In a nation where most identify as conservative, where most want to drill for oil, where most want lower spending, where most want lower taxes, where most despise Obamacare, where most view high unemployment as a bad thing, where most favor Romney over Obama on the economy, and where just 3 in 10 Americans believe the country is headed in the right direction, Barack Obama still has a chance at winning. This is largely due to the Democratic Party and the Democrat controlled media framing the debate around juicy side issues like birth control and racism to divert attention away from issues they know they can't win on.

Make no mistake, the Democrats have not forgotten 2010. If you'll recall, just two short years ago, Democrats suffered the worst defeat in the midterm elections by any party since 1938. Why? Because big issues were fresh in the minds of the American people. The economy. Obamacare. Spending.

This summer and fall should be a time where the Romney campaign hammers Obama relentlessly and aggressively on the issues he knows he can't win on. Electrify the base and secure Tea Party support with Marco Rubio. Make drilling, jobs, and the economy the central issues and give it a twist by vowing to bring all troops home from Afghanistan.

It is the Republicans' election to lose. And if they do, it will be because they have lost the war of ideas and failed to convey to the American people why Republicans are better suited to lead this country. That is the bottom line. 

Obama Bucks: Reason 2,391 why not to vote Democrat.

"Obama Bucks"

Now that's change you can believe in.

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Ron Paul Supporter Quote of the Day

This comes to me from "Anonymous"---

"I am a Ron Paul supporter because I oppose war without cause and I am pro-liberty.

Obviously I despise BOTH Obama and Romney because their stances are despicable.

BUT, come November I'll be hiring a van to take senior citizens who hate war to the polls to vote for Obama. And working like a dog to get as many votes as possible for him."

Tuesday, April 10, 2012

Romney vs. Obama. Is there a difference?

"Romney and Obama are the same".

That is the phrase I keep hearing from those who simply refuse to concede defeat. You know exactly who I am referring to here. I never thought it would come to this. Instead, we find ourselves in a fight against the most radical left president in American history, and the Republican challenger is viewed as "just as bad". The nonsense is laughable. They are the same misguided and misinformed people who love to say, "Fire them all! Republicans and Democrats are all the same!". Ok, should we fire Paul Ryan? Allen West? Marco Rubio?  Many now are unable to understand the simple differences between a potential Romney presidency, and the current Obama administration.

We can start by delving into personality and influences. Do I really need to explain to you how Mitt Romney and Barack Obama differ as men and leaders? I'm not going to, because it is unnecessary. Romney has led a life of executive leadership, and a successful one at that. Do we need to discuss early life influences? Romney had his father, George Romney, a successful businessman and governor. Obama had Frank Marshall Davis, Bill Ayers, Derrick Bell, Jeremiah Wright, etc. It shows in how both men developed into who they are today.

-What would a Romney administration look like? Would we have radicals such as Eric Holder, Van Jones, Anita Dunn, Steven Chu, Eboo Patel and others? Barack Obama has clearly built up an administration of people all sharing his agenda of "transforming" America. Does Romney hold the same deep seeded hatred for this country as Obama does, and would he act as such if he were to be president?

-Would a Mitt Romney presidency treat our strongest allies with as much disrespect and contempt as this current administration has? On the flipside, would he pander to nations that hate us? Would President Romney bow to the Saudi king?

-Would President Romney apologize to the rest of the world for America's mistakes? Would he apologize to Afghans after they murdered our troops? Would he sympathize with the Islamic world that calls us "The Great Satan"? Would he be indifferent towards the conflict in Afghanistan?

-Would a President Mitt Romney appoint potential Supreme Court nominees like Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor?

-Would a Romney administration try to ween us off oil in order to usher in green energy like Obama and his energy secretary are doing? Would a Romney administration choke our very own oil supply that lies at our fingertips in the Gulf, in Utah, North Dakota, and Alaska?

-Would a President Romney advocate the redistribution of wealth and embrace Occupy rhetoric like Obama has? Would Romney be a business friendly president? A capitalism embracing president? Or would he pursue "taxing the rich" to give to the poor? The two economic views are so polarizing, it gives you a headache. What gives me an even worse headache, is the fact that so many people simply don't understand the differences.

-Would a Romney administration be as rabidly pro abortion as the Obama administration? Does Romney openly support partial birth abortion? Would Romney rescind the Mexico City Policy on day two of taking office as Obama did, allowing federal tax dollars to flow to overseas nations to fund abortions?

-Would a Romney budget be as catastrophic as an Obama budget?

-Doesn't Mitt Romney's vast experience and proven record in creating wealth, balancing budgets, hiring employees, and reversing deficits count for anything? How does Mitt Romney's economic background fare against Obama's?

"Romney and Obama are the same". My foot.

You know, the further I get along in this post, the more I realize just how pointless it is. There is no comparison, because Barack H. Obama is just that bad.

To be fair, I am disgusted I even have to do this. One year ago today I would have laughed if I ever thought I would be defending Mitt Romney of all people. Mitt Romney, if you'll recall, was always my last choice to be the nominee. I am by no means a Mitt Romney "fan". Never, ever.

But it has come to this and we can't change what has already been done. Mitt Romney is already the nominee and it is going to be either him or Obama. Granted, he is not the best conservative, but I can't think of any greater incentive or motivation to vote for Romney than imagining a 2nd term for Barack Obama.

If Barack Obama wins in 2012, you are going to see an Obama you haven't seen before. If you think he is bad now, wait until 2013. Just as he so candidly told Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, "After my election I'll have more flexibility." More flexibility to do anything and everything he couldn't accomplish due to political constraints in the first term. Lame duck Obama is going to go all out. In addition, a second term for Obama could likely alter the makeup of the Supreme Court indefinitely, if indeed Ginsberg, Scalia, and Kennedy do retire. The balance of power in the judicial branch from Obama appointees would cause far left ripples this country could never recover from. On the flip side, if Romney were in office during this time, this would present a golden opportunity to cement a center-right majority in the court for years to come.

Why am I going to vote for Romney? Because somewhere out there is a rabid liberal who is going to vote for Obama. Maybe a latte sipping, Che worshiping, Occupy hippie in Berkeley. Maybe a pro-abortion, progressive female who wants "free birth control". Maybe a Black Panther thug who hates me because of my skin color. It doesn't matter. Somewhere out there, I am going to cancel out someone's vote. And 20 years from now I can look back and say I did what I could to keep Barack Obama from taking this country down an irreversible path. You bet I am voting my conscience in November. My conscience says do what is right to beat Obama. No matter what. This isn't an allegiance to the Republican party. I am not even a registered Republican. This is an allegiance to America and a vote for the economic future of the United States.

"But how will your life change personally if Romney gets elected?" is the question I hear often. To which I will reply, how did anyone's life personally change from the Reagan years, to the Bush years, to the Clinton years, to the Bush Jr. years, to the Obama years? Presidents have little impact on the personal lives of the citizens. But the influence of presidents have an extremely large and long lasting impact on the country as a whole. Through judicial appointees, economic policy, defense policy, spending, etc. To people who are still voting for Ron Paul, here's what I think of you. I think you are so bitter and ticked off the country didn't embrace your guy like you thought they would, that deep down you want another 4 years of Obama, just to teach America a lesson. You are going to vote for "Dr. Paul", the savior, even though he has less of a chance at winning than the chances of life on Pluto. Have at it. I am going to vote my conscience too. And my conscience tells me that I will do anything I can to keep Obama from a second term.