Monday, April 30, 2012

Forward! The Communist slogan now adopted by Obama. (PHOTOS)

Barack Obama's 2012 reelection campaign just released its official slogan for the year. The one iconic leftist propaganda phrase, "Forward".



I suspect this is, and always has been, Barack Obama's personal wet dream, cultivated from a very young age by his radical Marxist mother, self admitted Communist grandfather, and personal childhood mentor, Communist, America hater, and pedophile Frank Marshall Davis.

 The "Forward" slogan isn't anything new to politics. Wikipedia's article on the leftist term Forward states:
The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other leftwing newspapers and publications. For example, Vpered (Russian language for 'Forward') was the name of the publication that Lenin started after having resigned from the Iskra editorial board in 1905 after a clash with Georgi Plekhanov and the Mensheviks.
Just a few examples of the term Forward in Communist/Socialist/Marxist propaganda...

Forward for the Motherland, for our victory!
Under the leadership of the great Stalin - forward to Communism!


Young builders of communism! Forward, to the new successes in work and study!
Under the banner of Lenin and Stalin, forward to victory of communism! 

Go all out and aim high. The east leaps forward, the West is worried
Strike the battle drum of the Great Leap Forward ever louder

Ride the wind and cleave the waves to realise a Leap Forward in all fields

Let's march forward under the banner of Mao Zedong!

Sing revolutionary war songs with fervor, and move forward in victory.
Move fast forward! Construct and protect the Motherland.

The motherland doing a leap forward.


Forward! is also a common phrase within Communist propaganda music. Avante "Forward", Communists, stand up, forward!, Forward to meet the sunrise!, Forward against the Enemy, Forward friends, Forward Red Fleet Czech, Forward Red Marines, Glory to the looking forward, Go Forward Don't Fall, Time Forward...are just a few, as this Communist website will attest.



Democrat Socialist Perspective: Socialism- The Way Forward
Communist China: The Great Leap Forward
UK Socialist Party: The Way Forward for Anti-Capitalism
Marxists.org: Can We Go Forward If We Fear to Advance Towards Socialism?
South African Communist Party: Forward to Socialism!
India: Forward Communist Party
Socialistworker.org: Discussing the way forward for Occupy
Marxists.org: Forward to Socialist Revolution

All of this should come as no surprise to anyone who actively takes a look at who Barack Obama really is. As I pointed out in an earlier post on Obama's childhood influences, he was born to a radical Communist mother who hated religion, capitalism, and America. It just so happens that her father was also a Communist and also was Obama's legal guardian during his childhood in Hawaii. Also during young Barack Obama's time in Hawaii, said commie Grandpa introduced Obama to one Communist poet, America hater, Christian hater, and blatant pedophile, Frank Marshall Davis, who Obama describes as his "childhood mentor" in his best selling book, Dreams from My Father.

Is it any wonder why Barack Obama has surrounded himself with like minded people who share the same radical leftist ideology? And is it any wonder why some Obama administration officials have been caught and forced to resign for openly Communist views? Anita Dunn and Van Jones come to mind. I only wonder how many more there are. Is it any wonder why an ornament on the Obama Christmas tree at the White House showed the figure of Mao Zedong? Is it any wonder why fellow Marxists who were with Obama during his college years describe him as a "pure Marxist Socialist"? And is it any wonder now why he chooses FORWARD as his slogan? No one should be surprised.


Related:


Obama and Communist propaganda tactics
Barack Obama: A History of Communism
Obama's Marxist influences 



Left wing hypocrisy when it comes to life and war.

We all know the drill. When a Republican is president during a war, the anti-war, neo-hippies who value human life protest in droves. When a Democrat is president............... ......... ...... .... ... .. . . .

Ex-CIA Interrogator: Obama's War on Terror Is Less Ethical Than Bush's

It is a hypocrisy that reeks of self righteous indifference. Democrats and liberals make hypocrisy an art. When it comes to the of life and war, the party that touts itself as the one fighting for rights, tolerance, peace, and love falls short.

The Democrats' eerie silence during the Obama years on war is much the same as the Republicans' eerie silence on spending during the Bush years. Liberals love to ask, "Where was the tea party during the Bush years?" They have a valid point. But now I ask, "Where in the hell is the anti-war movement during the Obama years?" Gone without a trace. As Warden Norton put it in the Shawshank Redemption..."...up and vanished like a fart in the wind!"



Obama continued military operations both in Iraq and Afghanistan. But let's not stop there. Obama decided to go beyond what Bush could ever dream of, launching military operations in Yemen, Libya, and now has US special forces on the ground in Africa. Drone attacks in Pakistan have jumped from 8 strikes per year under Bush, to a staggering 63 strikes per year under Obama, and that isn't even counting the 8 months remaining in 2012. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reports 52 total strikes under Bush and 267 under Obama. Still "air raiding villages and killing civilians it seems..."

Oh but wait!

Obama ended the War in Iraq, remember? He put an end to Bush's stupid war. He brought the troops home!  The nonsense is laughable. If you'll recall, anti-war presidential candidate Obama promised throngs of salivating, fainting voters that bringing troops home from Iraq and ending the war would be the very first thing he would do as president. Instead, he stuck to the Bush timetable of 12/31/11 and put Iraq on the backburner while fighting for more important things.

"Obama got Osama!" Now this one really makes me want to vomit. The left actually pretending to care about the war on terrorism or capturing/killing Osama bin Laden. Because this happened under Obama's watch, the anti-war, hippie left is now ecstatic. Not because we killed Osama, but because Obama can take credit for something...anything. Nevermind the fact that the left adamantly opposed all operations in Afghanistan to fight the Taliban or kill Osama, as early as, well, before the invasion even took place in 2001! It's ok though, because Barack Obama is president.

American casualties during the Obama war years have skyrocketed. But the media won't report on that. During Bush's rule, from 2001-2008, 564 US troops died in Afghanistan, an average of 70 a year. During Obama's rule, from 2009-2012, 1314 US troops have died in Afghanistan, an average of 328 a year...and that isn't even counting the remaining 8 months of 2012! Where oh where is peace loving liberal media? Where oh where is the anti-war left?



They are liars and hypocrites.

On the issue of war they have no credibility. Expect the anti-war protests to magically spring to life once again if Mitt Romney wins the election. And if their disgusting, vile indifference towards war isn't bad enough, their hypocrisy on the value of life is even worse.

The party of rights and love and peace and tolerance somehow also seems to be the party that supports extinguishing human life in its most precious, delicate, and early stages...on a mass scale. Life is sacred and the most fundamental human right is life, yet those that tout themselves as the champions of human rights fail to acknowledge this most basic human right.

Yet somehow, these people that claim to love life, who love to protest war and the killing of innocent civilians (when a Republican is in power) and support the aborting of innocent human life strangely DO support the human life of those who have taken innocent human life, in the most diabolic of ways. It couldn't get any more backwards.

Liberals: Fighting for the right to life for Charles Manson, fighting against the right to life for an unborn child, and supporting war, if a Democrat is in charge.

"Our Hero" Ron Paul

Cross posted at RRR

Notice the capital "H". This was the latest headline over at The Daily Paul. I am actually taking a course called Cult Behavior 101. My textbook is The Daily Paul.

"Ron in past speeches has referenced the Lord of the Rings. For those of you that are familiar with the story, after hearing what my friend said, it made me think of Ron being Frodo and having to carry such a heavy burden in his quest to destroy the great evil that is close to destroying everything that We, the free peoples of this World hold dear. He carries all of our hopes and dreams. So my friends, My fellow Patriots, I ask you with great humbleness and sincerity, To remember, that we all need to be lifting Ron up and filling him with positive energy and Peace. We all need to be careful, To not drain our Hero in our quest to gain his energy and wisdom. To be mindful, To not increase his burden by placing our expectations on him. He has to be exhausted and overwhelmed. Let us all focus as much consciousness and energy as we can towards Ron, So he can find his balance and some Inner Peace."

Like I have said before, these types don't really fight for freedom. They fight for a figure they want to rely on, a cult of personality, and a Savior.

I wish the 10% of Ron Paul supporters who actually support the message more than the man would openly denounce the cult behavior spewed daily within the Paul ranks.

It is really a shame. Ron Paul had a good message but his candidacy was marred by lunatics and closet liberals within his base. The same happened in 2008 with Truthers, though that has died down a bit in 2012.

Maybe sometime within the next 10 years some of them will admit Ron Paul didn't get the nomination in 2012.

Sunday, April 29, 2012

Dan Savage: Obama's favorite homosexual who hates Christians (Video)


Anti-Bullying Speaker Curses Christian Teens

It was supposed to be an anti-bullying conference. Instead, it was a blatant attack on Christianity.
Savage was supposed to be delivering a speech about anti-bullying at the National High School Journalism Conference sponsored by the Journalism Education Association and the National Scholastic Press Association. But it turned into an episode of Christian-bashing. Tuttle said a number of his students were offended by Savage’s remarks – and some decided to leave the auditorium. “It became hostile,” he said. “It felt hostile as we were sitting in the audience – especially towards Christians who espouse beliefs that he was literally taking on.” Tuttle said the speech was laced with vulgarities and “sexual innuendo not appropriate for this age group.” At one point, he said Savage told the teenagers about how good his partner looked in a speedo. The conservative website CitizenLink was the first to report about the controversy. They interviewed a 17-year-old girl who was one of students who walked out of the auditorium. “The first thing he told the audience was, ‘I hope you’re all using birth control,’” she told CitizenLink. “he said there are people using the Bible as an excuse for gay bullying, because it says in Leviticus and Romans that being gay is wrong. Right after that, he said we can ignore all the (expletive deleted) in the Bible.” As the teenagers were walking out, Tuttle said that Savage heckled them and called them pansy-assed. “You can tell the Bible guys in the hall they can come back now because I’m done beating up the Bible,” Savage said as other students hollered and cheered. “It’s funny as someone who is on the receiving end of beatings that are justified by the Bible how pansy-assed people react when you push back.”


 The speech was delivered by militant man lover Dan Savage. His pointed attack on Christians under the guise of tolerance is typical of the left wing.

Dan Savage is your typical liberal. He preaches tolerance, peace, and love for everyone. Unless you are a Christian. Ironically, Muslims are exempt.

Bottom line: Dan Savage engages in disgusting, backwards, unnatural acts that are counter to human anatomy and the natural world.

No amount of Bible bashing can change these facts.

Note: The Obama administration is completely behind Dan Savage. (pun intended) The same Dan Savage that said he wished "All Republicans were f*****g dead." and that he wanted to "F*** the S*** out of Rick Santorum."


Saturday, April 28, 2012

Misandry Part 1: Violence towards men in popular music.

Misandry: The hatred of men.

Most don't even know the word. Feminism has seeped so deep into our culture that blatant violence against men is accepted in popular culture. We can see this in film, advertisement, and music.

In this post we will examine the latter and bring some meaning to a few songs you may have heard in the past. Male bashing is common in music. But it is most common primarily in the country genre, as you will find out below.

Have you ever heard the hit song "Gunpowder and Lead" by Miranda Lambert?

I'm goin' home, gonna load my shotgun
Wait by the door and light a cigarette
If he wants a fight well now he's got one
And he ain't seen me crazy yet
He slapped my face and he shook me like a rag doll
Don't that sound like a real man
I'm going to show him what a little girls are made of
Gunpowder and lead

It's half past ten, another six pack in
And I can feel the rumble like a cold black wind
He pulls in the drive, the gravel flies
He don't know what's waiting here this time

I'm goin' home, gonna load my shotgun
Wait by the door and light a cigarette
If he wants a fight well now he's got one
And he ain't seen me crazy yet
He slapped my face and he shook me like a rag doll
Don't that sound like a real man
I'm going to show him what a little girls are made of
Gunpowder and lead

His fist is big but my gun's bigger
He'll find out when I pull the trigger


Could you imagine if the tables were turned and a disgruntled man decided to blow away his ex-girlfriend with a shotgun? An innocent song perhaps. But it paints a bigger picture of society, in what is acceptable and what is not. On we go...

Carrie Underwood advocates more violence against men's property in her top hit "Before He Cheats".

Right now he's probably slow dancing with a bleached-blond tramp,
and she's probably getting frisky...
right now, he's probably buying her some fruity little drink
'cause she can't shoot whiskey...

Right now, he's probably up behind her with a pool-stick,
showing her how to shoot a combo...

And he don't know...

That I dug my key into the side of his
pretty little souped up 4 wheel drive,
carved my name into his leather seats...
I took a Louisville slugger to both headlights,
slashed a hole in all 4 tires...

Maybe next time he'll think before he cheats.

 Again, flip it around and what do you have? A national outrage from feminist groups against oppressive and misogynistic men who are degrading women. But it is never even thought of when the violence is directed at men. In fact, most people don't even give it a second thought.

Rihanna also continues this theme with her 2010 hit "Man Down" which depicts a woman shooting her male abuser in public.

Oh mama mama mama
I just shot a man down
In central station
In front of a big ol' crowd
Oh Why Oh Why
Oh mama mama mama
I just shot a man down
In central station

It's a 22
I Call her Peggy Sue
When she fits right down in my shoes
What do you expect me to do
If you're playing me for a fool
I will lose my cool
And reach for my fire arm

I didn't mean to lay him down
But it's too late to turn back now
Don't know what I was thinking
Now he's no longer living
So I'm bout to leave town

I would like to see what would happen if Toby Keith sang a song about shooting a woman to death in a train station.

In Taylor Swift's "Picture to Burn" we have the all too common theme. The evil male has broken the innocent  female's heart and now she wants revenge. Notice how in all these songs, the woman is burning with hate for the man and desires violent revenge? Very telling. In picture to burn Taylor Swift sings along while imagining violent intruders breaking into her ex-boyfriend's house and destroying all of his property in the most cruelly premeditated way.

In Kellie Pickler's "Best Days of Your Life", Pickler sings about how her cheating ex-boyfriend will never forget her. Then the music video really gets good. After his new girlfriend tells him she's pregnant, he runs across the street where Kellie Pickler and, of all people, Taylor Swift are walking on the sidewalk and pleads "I'm sorry." Not a second later the man gets hit by a bus for comedic effect while Pickler and Swift give a humorous wince, as if he just stubbed his toe instead of getting hit by a bus. Could you imagine a music video depicting a girl getting smashed by a bus?

In the Dixie Chicks hit, "Goodbye Earl"...you guessed it...a woman is wronged by yet another pig/man and she enacts righteous revenge for her suffering. This music video takes the double standard to an entirely new level. Earl is an abusive husband (as all husbands are). So the wife and her friends hatch a plan to murder him by poisoning his black eyed peas. Earl keels over and dies much to the jubilation of the entire town, who just happen to be all women. It is an upbeat song that shamelessly celebrates a man's death. But could you for one instant imagine if it was a man hatching a plan to murder his wife? The woman keels over dead on the floor while the video cuts to a throng of dancing, howling men rejoicing that she finally passed on. Don't laugh too hard, ok?

It is important to notice, not only do these extremely popular and mainstream songs advocate violence against men, they also portray men in a negative light, marching in lock step with the feminist ideology. Men are cheaters. Men are liars. Men are abusers. Men aren't needed. This negative undertone is far more insulting than the advocating of violence on the surface.

Why is it "funny" and entertaining for a woman to shoot a man, poison a man, watch a man get hit by a bus or key his car? This is our culture. Here's a fun experiment. Next time you are listening to the radio or your ipod or browsing music videos on Youtube, count how many times when a man is singing a song he is singing about how much he loves a woman. Then count how many times when a woman is singing a song she is singing about how much she hates a man. I think you already know the outcome.

In the next installment we will identify examples of violence towards men in advertisement. Stay tuned.

Friday, April 27, 2012

On Obama, McCain, Romney and the 2012 Election.

Cross posted at RRR.

I fully predict Mitt Romney to win the election this year in a close race. There will be no landslides this election in a starkly contrasted, divided electorate. This is an unbiased opinion I base on the outcome of the 2008 presidential election.

Let's take a trip down memory lane back to the year of Hope, Change, Unicorns and Katie Couric. 

In 2008, Barack Obama won the election by a 53% to 46% margin in the popular vote. This is by no means a landslide, though he did shatter the record for the highest popular vote total of all time for a presidential candidate at 69 million. John McCain, however, amassed the third highest vote total of all time. Many tout Barack Obama's win in 2008 as a landslide. Obama's 2008 "landslide" was the same as George H.W. Bush's "landslide" of 1988, which also resulted in an 53% to 46% margin. In 1984, Ronald Reagan beat Walter Mondale by a 59 to 41 margin. In 1972 Richard Nixon beat George McGovern by a 61 to 37 margin. In 1964 Lyndon Johnson beat Barry Goldwater by a 61 to 38 margin. In 1956, Eisenhower beat Adlai Stevenson by a 57 to 42 margin. These were landslides. Obama should have had a landslide. He didn't. Of course, one must take into account the electoral college as well, but that is a topic of discussion for another day.



Some things to consider regarding 2008
- The country had endured 8 tumultuous years under Republican George W. Bush
- Barack Obama represented a fresh, new change and ran a largely effective campaign funded by a historically large amount of campaign money. 
- The election took place fresh off the heels of a complete economic collapse, which happened under a Republican president.
- The increasingly unpopular War in Iraq had recently escalated, with the country being torn apart by civil war and American troops caught in the middle.
- The American media supported candidate Obama and the Obama campaign en masse, on an unprecedented scale. 
- Moderate Republican candidate John McCain ran an extremely weak and ineffective campaign.



These are all factors worth taking into consideration. The Democrat, whoever it was, was going to win in 2008. If a plastic spork ran with a (D) after its name he would have beat the Republican. George W. Bush was the cause of that. Yet, despite the seemingly effortless road to the White House, Obama most certainly did not win in a landslide, despite overwhelming support from the press who not only reported stories in his favor, but collectively moved into his corner altogether. 

Barack Obama was and still is a weak candidate who can rely only on the media, oratory, pop culture, and preying on emotional people to win. We can already see the signs of this 4 years later now in 2012. The Obama campaign will use tactics such as "The War on Women", appearances on late night shows, and class warfare rhetoric to win. It sold in 2008 but it won't sell this time. 



As the Republican primary season fades away so too will the Republican infighting, bickering, and bashing as we transition to the general election with a clear cut decision. Mitt Romney or Barack Obama. Former Governor Romney is a far better candidate than John McCain was. He is better funded, more organized, a better speaker, and his platform is well suited for the current political climate. Which brings me to my next point. The economy and jobs.

History shows us that incumbent presidents with high unemployment have extreme difficulty getting re-elected. Not since the days of FDR has an incumbent president won re-election with an unemployment rate higher than 7.2%. (it is currently still above 8%) Unless our economy experiences a massive boom, and unemployment drops exponentially, both highly unlikely prospects, Barack Obama is going to have a very tough time convincing voters to vote for him. No amount of media spin can change these facts.

If you cast aside the petty politics of the day and the media spinsters who are driven not by journalistic integrity but by sensationalism and emotionalism you can see the bigger picture painted in 2008 and today in 2012. America is still a center right nation and the economy is still the biggest issue. That is why Romney will win. 

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Immigration no longer requires assimilation.

Some time ago I wrote a post, more of a rant than anything, on extreme multiculturalism. I included President Teddy Roosevelt's wise words of wisdom on the topic.

"The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities."
 ---Theodore Roosevelt, 1915

 "We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin. But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn't doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people." 
---Theodore Roosevelt, 1919

Roosevelt saw the dangers of extreme multiculturalism undermining the American identity, even back then. Could you imagine what he would think today?

Could our nation be characterized as "dwellers in a polygot boarding house?" Unquestionably so.

Since when did immigration, legal or illegal, not include assimilation? The older I get and the more I actually observe the immigrant class, the more I realize that the immigrants we have coming to this country today in the 21st century are not the immigrants that came to America in droves in the early 20th century. There is a complete difference in ideology and philosophy between the two.

It is increasingly rare to find an immigrant who genuinely loves this country and wants to be an American first and foremost. Instead, the majority of immigrants choose to hold their allegiance to their native land, making no effort whatsoever to assimilate into the American culture.

Learn to bake apple pie. Try to watch baseball o fĂștbol Americano. Drive a Chevy. Learn about Thomas Jefferson and George Washington. Be proud to call yourself an American and honored to live in the greatest country on earth!

Instead, there are many who immigrate here with no intention of assimilating into the culture. America is simply a landmass, nothing more.

Perhaps I am a different breed. I can tell you, if I immigrated to any other country I would make a conscious effort to actively assimilate into that culture by learning the native language, adopting the customs, learning to appreciate that country's art and being happy and grateful to be a citizen of that nation. I can't imagine moving to Russia and refusing to learn Russian or flying a big fat patriotic American flag over my residence in Moscow. If I moved to another country and started a life there, I would proudly fly that nation's flag and be proud to call myself a citizen of that country, whether it is Canada, Spain, Argentina, or Sweden.

There are plenty of patriotic immigrants out there. From all nations. My time in the Army has allowed me to meet proud Americans of countless backgrounds: Korean, Indian, Mexican, and Iranian to name a few. They love America, which is why they chose to serve. Unfortunately these patriots are a dying breed.

The United States and the West are too tolerant. And immigrants know this. They know they can get away with it. Muslims are who I am referring to here and the European nations, primarily Britain, France, and Belgium are just now beginning to realize the destructive path they have started down. In Brussels, Muslims make up 25% of the total population, and segregate themselves into strict Islamic communities, such as "Little Morocco", which are governed by Shariah law and have no regard for the nation's rule of law. The same can be observed here in the United States, in places such as Dearborn, Michigan, which some have nicknamed "Dearbornistan".

It isn't just Muslims or those of Arab descent. There is an increasing number of immigrants of Hispanic origin who are beginning to identify with La Raza and the Mexica Movement in the American southwest. If you haven't heard of the Mexica Movement their mission statement goes something like this: "The United States stole land from Mexico and all European Americans should be deported to Europe and the American southwest given back to Mexico." This video pretty much sums it up...

These are extremists. But the basic ideology is widespread. No need to assimilate or better yet..."I am not an American." This is a problem and should be addressed. 

Vice President Marco Rubio discusses foreign policy. (Video)

My favorite comment: "Ron Paul 2012! Marco Rubio is just another statist zionist shill!" Typical. Come up with some new material Paultards!

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Primary mission: Beating Barack Obama

That should be first and foremost in every single American's mind. On the heels of Mitt Romney's 5 state sweep last night, moving him closer to the official nomination, it is evident there is a stark contrast in ideology among conservatives.

There are those who firmly believe a Mitt Romney presidency would be just as damaging, both short term and long term, as a second Obama term. I find this viewpoint utterly idiotic to be honest.

And there are those, like myself, who believe anything and everything should be done to help Mitt Romney challenge Obama. We acknowledge he isn't the perfect candidate, nor the perfect conservative. We live in an imperfect world and you have to work with what you have.

Liberty At Stake puts it perfectly in "We're All Mitten's Men Now".

"The point is, those of us in the conservative coalition need to get completely behind Romney, now that he is the sure GOP nominee, and do everything possible to help him defeat the Saul Alinsky radical in the White House. Any other position is fundamentally un-conservative. To be conservative is first and foremost to see the world as it is. Four more years of this inept and radical left wing governance from BHO and His Corrupt Gang of Progressiveswould be a complete disaster for the republic. Not casting a vote , or throwing away your vote on a quixotic 3rd party candidate, because Mittens isn’t the perfect conservative, is as good as voting for the Saul Alinsky radical. That’s how the system works. To be conservative is to understand when it is time to suck it up, hitch up the big boy pants, and cooperate to graduate. (Flag thrown for clichĂ© abuse) This is such a time. "

However, there are still those on the right who simply won't support Romney. Even if it means giving Obama another term.

Every day, I take a stroll over to Ron Paul Cult Central, AKA The Daily Paul, partly because half of me still likes Ron Paul and partly because I find the comments and articles from Ron Paul supporters wildly and childishly entertaining. These people take pride in attacking Mitt Romney more than Barack Obama. And they firmly believe Ron Paul still will win. Despite the fact Ron Paul has received the least amount of votes and the least amount of delegates out of the remaining 4 GOP candidates, somehow he still has the best chance of winning the nomination and the general election. The millions of people who voted for Mitt Romney over the course of the primary season just dropped from the sky apparently. Take this for example:

"Let's keep the eye on the prize. We were not expected to do well in Romney territory. But, look at the numbers. We are only growing. The media is starting to recognize our movement. We are about Dr. Paul and we are about a movement. We are not giving up on Dr. Paul and we are not giving up on the movement. The convention in Tampa is one goal but not the only goal. We can still get Dr. Paul the nomination. Don't be fooled by the media. But, keep in mind this is a long "slog" and we are laying the foundation for the future are well. Keep it up everyone. Lick your wounds from yesterday but keep it up and take pride in the work we are doing. Now, stop the chatter, get phone banking, get canvassing, get donating, get going. Go Ron Paul."

The denial and fantasy world they live in over there borders on 2008 Obamabot "free gas/mortgage" insanity. Just remember, there is a conspiracy to silence Ron Paul and he has actually won each state. In Tampa everyone will catch Paulbot Jew-hate hippie fever and be instantly overcome with Ron Paul rainbow flowerpower as he rides a powerful wave of momentum all the way to the White House....

Meanwhile, myself and the rest of those grounded in reality will get behind Romney. Why? Not because we like Romney. Not because we desire a Romney presidency. And not because it is what "The Republicans have told us to do." We will be voting with our conscience too. Our consciences tell us that Obama must be defeated.

Personally, I would prefer that the Judicial Branch not be overrun by radical left Obama appointees for the next 20-30 years. Would you prefer an ultra left supermajority on the Supreme Court?

Barack Obama is no ordinary Democrat. Barack Obama is a radical quasi-Marxist who has been bred from early childhood to hate the colonialism of the United States and the Western nations, the unfairness of capitalism and the free market system, and the "prejudice" of an American society run by white men. This is who Obama is. His arrogance and disdain for America far exceeds that of traditional Democrats like John Kerry or the late Ted Kennedy.

I am a conservative who is in tune with reality. Mitt Romney is our best chance to dethrone Barack Obama and I will fight for him to win with every last breath I have up until election day.

Now that's justice for Trayvon! Black mob beats white man nearly to death.

Man Beaten By Mob, In Critical Condition
According to police, Owens fussed at some kids playing basketball in the middle of Delmar Drive about 8:30 Saturday night. They say the kids left and a group of adults returned, armed with everything but the kitchen sink. Police tell News 5 the suspects used chairs, pipes and paint cans to beat Owens. Owens' sister, Ashley Parker, saw the attack. "It was the scariest thing I have ever witnessed." Parker says 20 people, all African American, attacked her brother on the front porch of his home, using "brass buckles, paint cans and anything they could get their hands on." Police will only say "multiple people" are involved. What Parker says happened next could make the fallout from the brutal beating even worse. As the attackers walked away, leaving Owen bleeding on the ground, Parker says one of them said "Now thats justice for Trayvon."


I hope Trayvon Martin's family, including his money grubbing mother who wants to make money off her dead son, race baiters Al Sharpton, Jesse Hijackson, Eric Holder, The Black Panthers, Barack Obama and every other black supremacist in this country is happy. Instead of urban blacks killing themselves, now they are targeting white people. Bravo to all those mentioned above. They called for more blood and they got it.

To those in the inner cities of all colors, black, white, tan, red, purple....I urge you to either A) move to an area where packs of wild savages like the people who attacked this man don't live or B) purchase a firearm and be ready to defend yourself.

The race riots will come and it will only get worse.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Cult behavior intermingles with politics.

Characteristics associated with cultic groups

Before reading these characteristics, I'd like you to think of what current political leaders and followers, in either party, qualify.

The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law. ‪

Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished. ‪ Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s). ‪

The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth). ‪

The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity). ‪

The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society. ‪ The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations). ‪

The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members' participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities). ‪

The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt in order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion. ‪

Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group. ‪

The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members. ‪

The group is preoccupied with making money. ‪ Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities. ‪

Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members. ‪ The most loyal members (the “true believers”) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group.

They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.


Well, who did you come up with? 

Monday, April 23, 2012

How Mia Love dismantles the liberals' racism/sexism argument.

Recently we have learned that conservative Republican Mia Love has won the nomination for Utah's newly created 4th Congressional District. The heads of liberals from coast to coast have exploded in sheer amazement. How could racist, women hating Republicans vote for a black woman? (I guess for the same reasons they voted for Herman Cain, Tim Scott, Charles Lollar, and Allen West...)

If this nomination of Mia Love in Utah isn't enough to dash the ill conceived notions of liberals and Obama supporters I don't know what is.

Some things to consider:

Utah is widely regarded as one of the most red states in the nation. Last year, Business Insider listed Utah as the 5th most conservative state in the nation, with Gallup polling data to back it up. Provo, Utah is consistently ranked as the most conservative city in the nation.

Utah has the 7th lowest population of African Americans per 100 citizens at 0.77. Over 80% of the population is white and less than 1% black.

The newly mapped 4th district Mia Love is running in contains the cities of Nephi, Payson, West Valley City, West Jordan, and Sandy.

Nephi: 5389 residents. 97% white.
Payson: 18294 residents. 94% white.
West Valley City: 129480 residents. 65% white. 33% hispanic.
West Jordan: 103712 residents. 89% white. 10% hispanic.
Sandy: 87461 residents. 93% white. 4% hispanic.

The highest percentage of African Americans is 1.96%, in West Valley City.

The two counties in Utah that the 4th district covers are Salt Lake and Utah counties with McCain getting 48% and 78% of the vote respectively in 2008. However, Salt Lake county includes Salt Lake City, which isn't within the 4th district. Even then, Obama won the county in 2008 by just 296 votes, out of 353680 total votes. Extremely conservative for a major city. In 2004, Salt Lake county voted for Bush by 60% and Utah county by 86%.

What can we learn from all this? That Utah's 4th district is extremely conservative and extremely white.

Yet they nominate a black woman to represent them. Mia Love and the intentions of voters in Utah's 4th Congressional District prove that the wild accusations of racism and sexism by those on the left towards the right are completely baseless.

Nice try libs. 

Sunday, April 22, 2012

Feminists attack LEGO for marketing toys for girls.

It's always a lose lose with feminazis. Exclude them and they'll scream "oppression". Include them and they'll fabricate a bogus claim that girls are being prodded by society from an early age to be.........GIRLS! The horror!
"They have little breasts and they have fancy hair," the organization's executive director, Dana Edell, told FoxNews.com. "And it just disturbs us that this is the image that they want girls to see." Edell also objects to what she calls stereotyping of preferred pastimes for girls. "What it's doing is telling girls that this is what's important to you," Edell said of the beauty parlor and hot tub sets. "Girls aren't building space shuttles, they're getting their nails done."

Would you rather they have huge arms, beards, and working construction?

This is the same psychopathic phobia that causes ultra relativist liberals in Sweden to test their idiot social experiments on pre-schoolers in a special "gender neutral school".  It is also the same disorder (and I'm putting that lightly) that drives a Canadian couple to raise their child in a "gender neutral" environment, free from "social constraints". A couple in Sweden also did this, and I'm sure there are many more around the world in enlightened hotspots of liberal enlightenment where up = down, right = wrong, and there is really no definition to anything at all, except what you make of it.

Boys and girls are genetically wired to be drawn to different things. It is how we grow up to be men and women, with unique characteristics, desires, and views of life. There are many liberals, and extreme feminists particularly, who simply do not understand the ways of the world and what is normal and what is not normal. They want men and women to be equal, not only in sensible matters such as suffrage and work pay, but also physically, mentally, and spiritually to a degree so extreme, that there no longer are any definitive characteristics of male and female and the concepts of femininity and masculinity are things of the past. 

This relativist ideology dominates thinking on the left, in every nation. 

Thursday, April 19, 2012

Ron Paul Supporter Quote of the Day: "I also will vote for Obama."


More insanity from the Ron Paul cult. I now wonder if the percentage of true conservative Ron Paul supporters who care about this country is 2% or 1%. Maybe even less.


"Yes, I will also vote for Obama. It's to show the GOP the same respect they've given Ron Paul in this election. I'm not the only one. I used to believe in voting with my conscience, but, the system is a joke, so might as well treat it as such."


Wednesday, April 18, 2012

America's poor: Not so poor.

Is our country really that poor? I don't think so.

The moment those in poverty sell their television, their personal computer, their cell phone, their Air Jordans, their silver watches, gold chains, and 22s then I might consider that person to be in a state of relative poverty.

The United States is the only nation on earth where "poor" people can still afford a decent sized house/apartment, a computer and monthly internet service, a TV, a cell phone, expensive shoes, a car, lottery tickets, cigarettes, and routine weekend escapades to the clubs and bars downtown.

These are the same people who are "struggling to put food on the table" and desperately in need of government assistance.


Don't tell me you're poor because you can't afford to go to the club this weekend. And don't tell me our government needs to "tax the rich" so you can indulge yourself some more on the taxpayer dime.

The moment I see a homeless person with basketball shoes or a basketball jersey, a watch, nice jeans, and a cell phone, I lose any and all sympathy I might have had for them. Likewise, I have no sympathy for the "struggling" lower class in America who somehow doesn't have enough money to put food on the table but has plenty of money for non-necessities.

The American standard of living far exceeds that of the rest of the world, and our warped perception of "poverty" is a testament to this. Anyone who has traveled to a 3rd world country can attest.


Along similar lines,  the poverty stricken "victims" of this unfair, cruel, and inherently racist society also seem to be able to afford Obama 2012 bumper stickers in droves for their low riding Cadillacs and Lincolns.

Give me a break. 

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Anti Obama Ammunition for 2012.

Americans for Prosperity makes great videos. Here are a few of their best on Solyndra...






ShePac's effective "Million Dollar Man" video...



Here is the RNC's most popular video and probably the most effective.



And another from the RNC...



American Crossroads is also a good source of anti-Obama videos. Their best in my opinion...



On Operation Fast and Furious, the NRA has provided us this comprehensive video...



IlluminatiTV did a video on Barack Obama's support of partial birth abortion back in 2008. I think the video is still relevant in 2012...



10000Pennies has put out some of the very best easy to understand videos for those who might not follow politics as much...



(I highly recommend 10000Pennies videos. They are entertaining and easy to understand. These are definitely the videos you want to share on Facebook or other social media.)


Glenn Beck put out this video in response to Obama's Tom Hanks propaganda piece, The Road We've Traveled...



On a humorous note, here's this one from the NRSC...



A lot of propaganda, but propaganda we need, because the other side will be churning out Soros funded propaganda videos left and right this year.

Have any other favorite videos to share with friends who might not be as politically active? Feel free to share and I'll add them to the list.


The best rant against Occupy Wall Street you'll ever hear.

I will warn all of you, these following videos include extremely heavy profanity. If you are offended by profanity in any way, you might not like these exchanges.

To anyone who hates Occupy, class warfare, and the divide and conquer tactics of the left, you will find these rants completely therapeutic. If you would enjoy listening to someone thrash the liberal agenda in a way that makes Micheal Savage appear nice, then I highly encourage you to listen.


Opie and Anthony rail against pampered, suburban baby Occupy protesters and how they differ from Middle East protesters. 


Opie and Anthony take callers from Occupy supporters in this video. Wait for the complete ERUPTION of rage from Anthony at 4:50 in response to a caller talking about economic unfairness. 


In related news, 5 more Occupy protesters were arrested yesterday for blocking the entrance to the New York Stock Exchange. 

Monday, April 16, 2012

VIDEO: Bob Beckel's Hilarious F Bomb on Hannity!

I really found this exchange quite funny for a number of reasons.

1) His passion and forcefulness when actually saying the word as well as his ignorance in not knowing they were on the air well into the clip.
2) Neal Boortz trying to spin the toy football 15 seconds in.
3) The perfect illustration of the quintessential liberal. No sense of civil discourse and blaming another for your F**k up. Yes, pun intended!

Just an all around hilarious video no matter what political side you are on!



H/T The Last Tradition

Infowars and followers of the Alex Jones cult.

Usually, if I ever get into any sort of political discussion with anyone, the moment they use Infowars.com as a source, I know any sort of rational debate or discourse is over and promptly end the conversation. The followers of the Alex Jones cult and his premier propaganda outlet, Infowars, are some of the most despicable people that can be found across the entire political spectrum.

Take this article for example.

Man Locked in House Burned to Death in Foreclosure Eviction Shoot-out with Cops

Police say a man shot a sheriff’s deputy and a locksmith when they tried to evict him from the his apartment which was being foreclosed on.

Police say the man then locked himself inside the house resulting in a standoff with police during which police flew flash grenades, tear gas and other concussive explosive devices into the apartment for over an hour in an attempt to force the man out.

The result of the chaos was a fire during the which the man was burned to death.

Seemingly a non story. But if you'll look at the comments from the Infowars community, you will see that the entire purpose of this story was to blame the police for "murdering" an innocent citizen; and further proof of the "fascist police state".

Some words of wisdom from the Alex Jones crowd:

"Were the cops wearing their black executioner hoods when they killed the guy? They at least owed him that… to know the faces of his killers."

"Maybe this type of resistance is just what the doctor ordered (and I don’t mean Ron Paul). A rapid response team of well disciplined patriots could have swept in and cleaned out that SWAT team in 30 seconds flat. Hell, they only had 10 hours to prepare for it! I envision about 15 men on fast motorcycles armed with well sighted semi automatic rifles coming in from behind with a surprise attack inflicting enormous, demoralizing damage to the NWO minions. They could vanish in all directions as quickly as they came in. And when the cops parade their falled “heros” through the streets of Modesto for the fools to worship, they could attack them again! This is where it is all headed so why waste time. They will get the hint real quick that there is no percentage in doing the banker’s bidding. Organize!!!"

"Suicide by cop. There are some things that are worse than death itself, like living on the streets, enslavement or Fascism, of course there are those who actually think otherwise, like homeless people, slaves and Fascists."

"I keep telling everyone Cops are not our friends..When my States says its illegal to carry nun-Chucks or a metal baton ..I say come and get them..We have the right to bear arms any arms!!!
This Country is going to be at war soon!!!"


Notice not a single word of condemnation for the criminal who shot and killed the locksmith and deputy. So is the nature of Alex Jones anarchists.


I almost got sucked in to the anarchist, anti-authority, 9/11 truther, Alex Jones crowd. Until I realized they were just that. A fringe group of extreme anarchist libertarians who hate America and believe a government conspiracy is the cause every time their internet connection goes out. These people represent a small cross section of the Ron Paul base. Speaking from personal experience, the time I began taking everything that Alex Jones and Infowars said as gospel was also the time when I began to follow Ron Paul (roughly 2007-2008). Many of their views are in bed with each other and, if you'll look very closely, aligned with the Occupy Wall Street movement as well.

Alex Jones types within the Ron Paul movement do not in any way help his credibility, or the credibility of Ron Paul followers. I've written many times about "The Ron Paul Cult" and I've also stressed that these nutjobs are not representative of the entire Paul base. Regardless, they should be addressed by someone. The Ron Paul following has been hijacked from sensible limited government libertarians (Tim Daniel of Left Coast Rebel comes to mind) by extreme anarchist lunatics who share a variety of characteristics including: blatant and vicious Antisemitism, complete disregard for any and all authority, equal hatred for conservatives and liberals, 9/11 conspiracy theories, hatred towards the military and police, and rabid support for legalizing drugs. These views are exactly in lock step with the Occupy Wall Street movement.

Alex Jones and his following of cowardly, Guy Fawkes mask wearing, anarchist children and revolutionary wannabes should be rounded up and put in the fictional Fema "concentration camps" they so love to scream about. Hopefully, under the watchful and abusive guard of the police officers and SWAT teams they so badly want to kill.

Mitt Romney vs. Barack Obama. Who is really out of touch?

This is something I have wanted to address for some time now.

A common talking point within political discussion these days is that mean, white, rich Republican Mitt Romney is out of touch with the blue collar American and Barack Obama somehow is.

These ignorant ramblings will be emanating from the left wing Democratic Party corpse from now until election day.

A few examples from Occupy Democrats for Obama:

"Obama has this in the bag. Romney is the epitome of 1% and he does not give a rat’s ass about the middle and lower class. The only bags that are being packed are the ones Romney will have to pack going back to Massachusetts.. OBAMA 2012"

"Romney, A greedy tax cheat who stashes his ill-gotten money in Swiss banks like the Mafia, I believe that there is something more than just the typical money laundering charge with people who hide their money in foreign accounts. by refusing to divulge it, Romney may be hiding something even bigger than just not paying taxes or the methods in which he obtained his wealth by stealing money from regular Americans, I think that there is something even shadier going on with the Mormon guy. I just can’t believe that Republicans would support this very very shady man."

"LMAO …… Mitt … you and your non working wifey poo are just a couple of blow hards. I’ve got news for both of you …… the Whitehouse is no longer for sale to you rich pieces of ****."

Of course, I wouldn't expect any less from the ignorant, cult members of the left who, ironically, take their marching orders from the corrupt Chicago on the Potomac leviathan who spoon feeds them every manner of divisive talking points. Women are "under attack". Republicans hate minorities. Rich people need to be taxed higher to pay for poor people's cigarettes, booze, and lottery tickets, etc.

Speaking of rich, out of touch people...let's take a look at our "down to earth" President the rich people-haters so love to worship as "one of them".

In 2007, Barack Obama made 4.2 million. In 2008, 2.6 million. In 2009, 5.5 million. In 2010, 1.7 million. In 2011, only $789,674. Wow, it really took a dip!

Bear in mind, this is the guy whose income is from writing a book and being in government. Never has be worked a real job. Never has be filled a payroll. Never has he hired a worker. Never has he struggled to pay for anything. The guy was pampered from day one, through college, all the way to the White House and it shows in his and his family's behavior, as if Emperor and Empress.

The Dear Leader who is so in touch with the every day American is the guy who has continues to take extravagant, lavish vacations on the taxpayer dime. 1.4 million family vaca to Hawaii. A 10 day private excursion at Martha's Vineyard. 92+ rounds of golf. Secret "Alice in Wonderland" parties at the White House with Johnny Depp.

At least when Bush vacationed, he went to his own place and spent his off time clearing brush.

Michelle? The "down to earth" First Lady spent 10 million effing dollars in vacations in ONE year. Michelle, the "down to earth" First Lady flies to her exotic vacation spots separately. Michelle, the--you get the picture...enjoying the fruits of her labor with 60 of her friends on vacation in Spain. Michelle Obama, who carries around a $6000 purse. And wears $635 shoes. And 40K diamonds. And 2K dresses.

Barack and Michelle Obama are perhaps the most out of touch political family in America. They are fraud lawyers who have never worked a real job in their lives. Never created any wealth. Never struggled paycheck to paycheck. Never contributed a single, damn thing to the American economy.

As of just a few days ago, Barack is now "scouting out" Colombia as another possible vacation spot for Empress Michelle.

It is such a sick irony.

You all better get used to it. This will be a liberal attack you are going to hear the entire year. 

Sunday, April 15, 2012

The Obama Secret Service: Fun with pictures





And below is a blank template. Have fun and be creative!